Saturn In Libra - Order In the Court!

The planet Saturn has entered the sign of Libra until October 2012. Saturn is pretty serious stuff.  Saturn deals with weighty issues of responsibility, structure and authority, and wastes no time getting down to business.

In Libra, this serious focus turns to relationships and partnerships of all kinds (romantic, business, adversarial, etc.) and the entire notion of “relating” in general.  It also puts the focus on marriage, which is vitally important to the sign of Libra, as are issues regarding law, civility, and fairness.

You never know which side of the scale you’re going to get when Saturn is in Libra.  On the one hand, history shows us this dynamic during the United States’ Civil War (1862-1865).  On the other hand, we’ve seen the glorious wedding of Prince Charles and Lady Diana (1981).  Sometimes you get both sides: The rock band Yes said “no” and broke up in 1981, only to say “yes” again a couple of years later to re-form.

The Judge

Saturn in Libra at its best brings out the Judge archetype.  It’s about being centered, seeing both sides of any situation with a clear and level head, carefully weighing the options, and then making wise decisions.

Saturn was moving through Libra when Ronald Reagan appointed the first woman to the United States Supreme Court, taking a step toward establishing a more balanced Court, a balance that continues to slowly equalize to this day, during this Saturn in Libra cycle, as Elena Kagan becomes the 4th female judge to hold a seat.

The next two years could see important steps forward in legal issues regarding marriage, especially the issue of gay marriage, or it could see some major steps backward.  It all depends on how willing and able both sides are to respond to the challenges wisely.

The Victim

Saturn in Libra can constellate at its worst in the Victim archetype, when all that is unfair and unjust in life dominates, and when the most important question becomes, who is to blame?

In relationships, what do you consider fair and just?  How objective are you?  How thoughtful are you in your relationships?  Do you lose center and make hasty, emotional decisions, or do you take time to think about it?  These kinds of questions will tend to arise while Saturn is moving through Libra (and if they haven’t so far, they just did when you read this), and with Saturn it's time to take responsibility rather than place blame.  Perhaps the most important question is, how do you relate to yourself?  Your relationships are, after all, a reflection of yourself and what you value.

The key is to strive for balance, while remembering that balance is very delicate work, by no means easy to attain.  Balance is not fixed or stable.  Once balance is attained it must be maintained, for it will constantly shift as relationship dynamics constantly shift.  Unless, of course, you have successfully managed to live in a controlled relationship, in a controlled environment, on a controlled path, and―scratch that... that’s not a relationship!

Albert Einstein said, "It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer."  It’s a gift to have Saturn in Libra at this time, with all of its potential for wisdom and relationship.  The wise decision, however, is not usually the easy decision, which is probably why adopting a judge-like mentality for the next two years can be extremely beneficial, as can staying with problems a little longer when necessary.  When things get out of hand, demand a recess.  Or bang your gavel and shout, "Order in the court!"    Take some time, on purpose, and consider what you're building for the next 2+ years.  Love can build a bridge, or love can build a wall.  The decision is yours.

Reflections of the Vampire

My mother’s response to all-things-Vampire is, “Oh, gross. I don’t know how you like any of that stuff. It’s disgusting.”

Whether or not you find sickly pale skin and lack of a heartbeat appalling or appealing, it appears that Vampires are all the rage right now. Other than just writing them off as dark imaginings for the purposes of entertainment, what’s really going on with the ever-increasing popularity of these creatures of the night is quite interesting. Somehow the story of Dracula has transformed into the popular Interview With the Vampire series and Buffy the Vampire Slayer, which paved the way for Angel and the global phenomenon of the Twilight saga, not to mention True Blood, V (those reptiles are total vampires!), The Vampire Diaries, The Gates, Underworld, and a seemingly endless stream of other movies, television shows and books that reflect these strangers of the night who can’t actually reflect themselves.

Vampires are creatures of intense desire who feed off human blood to survive, eventually draining their victims of all life. They sleep in coffins during the day, and can only come out at night because they happen to turn to ash when exposed to sunlight (although certain modern versions are more flexible with this bit). They glamour you with their fabulously alluring eyes before sinking their fangs into your neck for the first (and probably last) bite. They are warded off by sacred objects like holy water and crosses, and a nifty built-in safety feature for humans is that vampires can only enter your house by invitation. If you want a symbolic example of what happens if you innocently invite one in, check out Judi Dench in Notes On a Scandal and give yourself a gold star.

Taking these descriptors archetypally and looking at the state of the world right now, you might, if you’re so inclined, make a strong case that the United States invited a vampire presidential cabinet into our home (the White House) for eight years at the start of the 21st century. Now, issues regarding border security (boundaries) are almost a daily feature on the news.

Or you might consider that most of the modern vampire stories emerge from and are set in the South—arguably the “heart” of this country, that once lost a battle with the “head” of the North—perhaps as an outpouring of left-over residential ire of the Civil War.

You could even stretch it back to the founding of the United States altogether, with the Vampire as a symbol of the violently destructive forces that have single-handedly drained and decimated the Native American culture for the sake of survival. And, taking that into account while broadening our scope to the stronghold of Christianity over the last two thousand years of history, it’s probably worth noting that the holy communion is essentially symbolic of drinking someone's blood and eating a piece of their body. Communion and consummation, anyone?

And believe it or not, as the popularity of “Twilight” indicates, these dynamics apparently constitute the characteristics of modern romance! I guess it’s not too surprising amidst the ridiculously high number of marriages ending in messy divorces (I know a couple of people who seem to get married because they like the divorce process so much) and the challenge of redefining marriage in the modern era.

Interestingly enough, our cultural images of the romantic ideal have flip-flopped. The one-time image of a snowy white dead female is now replaced by a severely anemic, pasty white dead male.

Which brings me back to the fact that Vampires are, when all is said and done, dead. Dead. Cold. Lifeless. (I consider that a deal-breaker in relationships, but perhaps that's just me.)

One of my favorite ways of looking at the Vampire symbolically is through its connection to the past. See, vampires were human at one point; humans turned into vampires by another vampire. At the point when a human is turned, the human is dead. To see the person “alive” again is symbolic of our own desire to not only live in the past, but to take it to bed and sleep with it. Vampires are essentially an image of the past walking around on two legs and seducing you into living with it, turning your eyes away from the light of a new day, living an endless night, draining your own life force by living more in the past than in the present. Granted, the past can be very seductive. Romanticizing the past has a certain appeal: you survived it. Staring directly at an uncertain future can be not only troubling, but downright frightening. So frightening, in fact, that the false security of the past (“false” because it’s passed, it’s over) can seem positively luminous by comparison.

A good reminder in these times are the words from futuristic show Stargate SG-1, wisely imparted to Sam by Teal’c as she worried about stepping forward into her own uncertain future: “Draw from your past, but do not let your past draw from you.”

The Cyclic Nature of Reality

The Cyclical Nature of Reality by Shawn Nygaard

Part 1:  The Marriage of the Millennium.

One of the thrills of studying astrology is becoming ever-more-familiar with the cyclic nature of reality.

The nature of cycles is not one of the strengths of Western culture, although it’s undoubtedly something women are more intimately familiar with than men, at least on the personal, physical level every month.  Yet from a larger perspective, cycles really are “feminine” in their very nature.  They invite us in rather than push us away.

Western culture has tended to prefer the “masculine,” linear, rational, forward-marching, progressive, left-brained approach to life.  The road to forward-marching progress may be paved with good intentions (or not), but when history happens to repeat itself, it’s often considered from a masculine perspective to be a major inconvenience, an error in fact, as if we didn’t get something right and we are being punished by some kind of “in your face” God who rolls His all-seeing eyes at our unbelievable ignorance.

Linear progress has sterilized the mysteries of alchemy into the data of chemistry, the symbolism of astrology into the calculations of astrophysics, the awe of mysticism into the power structures of religion, the power of wisdom into binary bits and sound-bytes.  “Once upon a time...” has become a fairy tale for children, rather than a personal entryway into the soul.

Yet, as science has opened up the universe while simultaneously turning it into data, the images sent our way from the Hubble telescope continue to be more art than science, more beauty than order, like water-color paintings emerging from an eternal Romantic Era of the Universe, a lonely heart announcing the reality of more connection than we can possibly dream or feel.  It's a pardox:  the closer we move to anything, the more separation we perceive (microscopes do not inspire unity); the further we travel from something, the closer we are to everything and the more obvious is the connection.  It's an illusion.  And it's real.  We are each a pixel viewing the movie in which we're starring.

“What goes around comes around.”  A cliché, or a mystical Truth?

Personally, I can no longer side with just the masculine or the feminine, the linear or the cyclic, the logical or the magical, just the head or just the heart.  Moving forward, I can only embrace the vitality of both.  A few years ago Sally Field was cheered and lauded for proclaiming to her world-wide audience from the Academy Awards podium that if mothers ruled the world, there would be no more war.  Massive applause.  Yet, the next morning when I asked every person I saw who 100% approved of that message if they would want their own mother ruling the world, the shock and horror at the very suggestion revealed that it’s a more complicated issue than we probably care to admit.  The answer to the limitations of the patriarchal worldview is not a matriarchal view.  Far beyond our comfort zone, we must accommodate a marriage of the two.

A pile of words and data is meaningless on its own; a cycle without direction is merely pedaling in place.

The marriage of linear and cyclic realities, of lines and circles, is upon us.  It’s the wedding of the new millennium, and the invitations have been sent out.  What will you RSVP?

To be continued in Part 2.